H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Roger Federer vs Sjeng Schalken H2H: 4-1

Roger Federer holds a 4–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2003 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-3 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 4, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Roger Federer #5 6-3 6-4 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #12 Match data
Mar 22, 2003* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Roger Federer #4 6-3 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #14 Match data
Feb 22, 2003* Rotterdam ATP 250 QF Hard Roger Federer #5 6-2 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #19 Match data
Jun 22, 2002* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 QF Grass Sjeng Schalken #31 3-6 7-5 6-3 Roger Federer #9 Match data
Sep 2, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Roger Federer #13 6-4 7-5 7-6(3) Sjeng Schalken #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Sjeng Schalken
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 — — — — — — —
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 — — — — — — —
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 — — — — — — —
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 — — — — — — —
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 — — — — — — —
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —