H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Roger Federer vs Tim Henman H2H: 7-6

Roger Federer holds a 7–6 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 6–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2006 Japan Open final 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 – 6
13 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-3 Tim Henman #55 Match data Oct 8, 2006* F Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-4 7-5 Tim Henman #62 Match data Sep 1, 2006* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Roger Federer #1 6-4 6-0 6-2 Tim Henman #64 Match data Jun 30, 2006* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Roger Federer #1 6-4 6-2 Tim Henman #7 Match data Mar 27, 2005* QF Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #6 Match data Sep 12, 2004* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-3 Tim Henman #10 Match data Mar 15, 2004* F Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Henman #11 6-3 7-6(9) Roger Federer #1 Match data Feb 21, 2004* QF ABN AMRO Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tim Henman #31 7-6(5) 6-1 Roger Federer #3 Match data Nov 2, 2003* QF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Roger Federer #14 6-2 (ret.) Tim Henman #6 Match data Mar 23, 2002* R16 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-4 6-2 Roger Federer #13 Match data Oct 28, 2001* F Swiss Indoors ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Tim Henman #11 7-5 7-6(6) 2-6 7-6(6) Roger Federer #15 Match data Jul 6, 2001* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tim Henman #10 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Roger Federer #31 Match data Oct 14, 2000* SF Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tim Henman #6 6-3 7-5 Roger Federer #106 Match data Oct 9, 1999* QF Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,432 1,219 272 81.8% 20 28 6 24 25 103
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 34–29 54.0% #29 1,790 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,103 1 11 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 2004 71–6 92.2% #1 2,277 4 22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,342 6 33 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,399 9 45 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,327 12 53 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2008 66–16 80.5% #2 2,212 13 57 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,264 15 61 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,338 16 70 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2012 72–12 85.7% #2 2,339 17 76 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,354 17 82 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,402 17 88 — — — — — — —
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,285 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,387 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,259 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,238 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,238 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,155 20 103 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roger Federer Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 19 9 28 67.9% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2002 31 11 42 73.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2003 43 10 53 81.1% 16 4 20 80.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 2004 45 4 49 91.8% 14 2 16 87.5% 12 0 12 100.0% — — — — 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 2005 50 1 51 98.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 12 0 12 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2006 57 2 59 96.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 12 0 12 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 2007 44 6 50 88.0% 16 3 19 84.2% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2008 34 11 45 75.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2009 36 10 46 78.3% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2010 48 7 55 87.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2011 45 7 52 86.5% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2012 44 8 52 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 15 2 17 88.2% — — — — 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 28 11 39 71.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2014 51 8 59 86.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2015 37 6 43 86.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 8 2 10 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 41 4 45 91.1% — — — — 12 1 13 92.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 37 8 45 82.2% — — — — 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 33 7 40 82.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 770 158 928 83.0% 215 69 284 75.7% 192 29 221 86.9% 42 16 58 72.4% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,415/1,491 of Roger Federer's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roger Federer Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1998 5/5 4.8 2.8 55.6% 71.3% 52.0% 68.0% 41.3% 62.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 22/26 5.4 3.7 58.0% 70.6% 50.7% 55.9% 43.7% 62.1% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 46/63 7.2 3.5 59.1% 72.0% 53.4% 61.8% 43.8% 64.1% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 56/66 8.0 3.1 58.6% 74.0% 52.8% 63.2% 40.8% 65.3% 38.3% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 2002 66/77 6.7 2.6 60.6% 76.0% 54.5% 64.5% 47.2% 67.6% 39.2% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 2003 85/90 7.7 3.0 59.5% 77.4% 58.1% 62.8% 46.8% 69.5% 42.5% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 2004 74/77 7.6 2.1 62.0% 78.8% 59.2% 71.0% 43.0% 71.3% 42.1% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 2005 84/84 7.1 1.8 63.3% 76.8% 60.1% 63.0% 48.6% 70.7% 42.8% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 2006 95/95 6.9 1.2 62.8% 77.7% 60.6% 66.4% 47.5% 71.3% 43.0% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 2007 75/76 8.0 1.1 62.0% 77.8% 60.2% 63.1% 42.8% 70.9% 41.4% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2008 76/82 8.8 0.9 64.7% 77.3% 59.2% 68.9% 44.9% 71.0% 41.2% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2009 71/71 9.3 1.9 62.6% 79.9% 58.4% 70.4% 44.8% 71.8% 38.7% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2010 78/79 8.4 1.4 62.0% 79.6% 57.1% 67.9% 46.1% 71.2% 40.9% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2011 73/73 6.9 1.3 63.8% 79.4% 59.9% 63.0% 46.1% 72.3% 41.2% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2012 74/84 8.3 1.6 62.6% 79.2% 61.5% 71.3% 47.3% 72.4% 39.8% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 2013 62/62 6.4 1.7 62.7% 77.1% 57.4% 66.7% 42.8% 69.6% 40.8% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 2014 78/80 8.0 1.5 63.8% 80.2% 59.1% 74.8% 46.1% 72.4% 40.9% 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
33 2015 72/72 8.3 1.7 64.2% 81.1% 59.1% 64.0% 42.9% 73.2% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 28/28 8.8 1.8 62.3% 80.2% 56.9% 55.7% 39.5% 71.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 57/58 9.6 1.8 62.2% 80.7% 60.5% 64.9% 42.3% 73.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 58/59 9.2 1.9 61.8% 81.4% 60.0% 64.9% 46.0% 73.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 61/64 7.5 1.6 64.7% 79.1% 60.9% 70.9% 45.6% 72.7% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 6/6 11.0 2.2 66.8% 74.8% 56.0% 71.6% 39.6% 68.3% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 13/14 8.4 0.8 66.0% 74.0% 57.1% 68.3% 38.5% 68.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,415/1,491 7.9 1.9 62.3% 78.1% 58.5% 66.3% 45.0% 70.7% 40.5% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roger Federer Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1531 124.1 -0.27 +1.46 0.992 49.4% +46 — — 40.0% -0.20 — 1–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1664 137.6 +0.59 -0.29 0.962 49.3% +54 -178 — 46.2% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1791 147.8 +1.73 -1.34 0.976 49.9% +29 -256 -255 53.5% +0.23 7–11 (39%) 15–15 (50%) — -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1874 152.8 +2.77 +1.18 1.104 51.6% +6 -185 -97 62.8% +0.73 16–7 (70%) 24–17 (59%) — -0.94 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 2002 1944 157.7 +4.95 +1.81 1.207 53.2% +36 -161 -172 67.4% +1.09 8–10 (44%) 17–11 (61%) — +0.25 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 2003 2104 160.5 +6.67 +5.07 1.392 55.5% +4 -242 -6 75.8% +1.74 14–8 (64%) 25–16 (61%) — -0.34 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 2004 2278 170.0 +8.06 +5.97 1.467 56.2% +13 -270 -32 83.5% +2.21 12–3 (80%) 20–5 (80%) — -2.04 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 2005 2343 171.0 +8.25 +6.57 1.459 56.2% +49 -222 +90 86.0% +2.09 15–3 (83%) 28–11 (72%) — -0.43 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 2006 2400 172.2 +8.93 +6.54 1.498 56.6% +70 -164 +113 84.6% +2.25 18–2 (90%) 37–14 (73%) — -0.72 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 2007 2327 174.3 +8.00 +5.89 1.420 55.4% +70 -34 +244 82.4% +1.89 11–4 (73%) 27–9 (75%) — -0.78 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 2008 2212 171.1 +7.83 +5.50 1.420 55.4% +57 +138 +349 77.1% +1.70 8–9 (47%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.55 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 2009 2265 175.1 +8.67 +3.94 1.370 54.6% -22 +153 +391 77.7% +1.60 10–11 (48%) 26–11 (70%) — -1.08 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 2010 2311 176.3 +8.19 +5.25 1.418 55.4% +74 +19 +260 77.9% +1.71 11–6 (65%) 21–10 (68%) — -1.35 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 2011 2339 179.2 +9.63 +5.23 1.485 56.2% +64 +28 +206 79.3% +1.80 6–6 (50%) 19–9 (68%) — -1.12 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 2012 2339 177.8 +9.37 +4.25 1.443 55.4% +40 +42 +234 77.1% +1.76 14–4 (78%) 21–14 (60%) — -2.11 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 2013 2189 175.5 +6.21 +4.69 1.339 54.7% +90 +81 +316 68.1% +1.26 13–8 (62%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.39 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 2014 2354 179.1 +8.51 +5.79 1.484 55.8% +49 -129 +147 77.1% +1.71 17–7 (71%) 24–15 (62%) — -0.07 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
33 2015 2402 182.0 +9.20 +6.49 1.539 56.3% +67 -142 +145 79.2% +1.90 9–4 (69%) 17–13 (57%) — -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 2286 158.1 +6.68 +3.70 1.395 54.6% +156 -88 +162 73.4% +1.43 3–4 (43%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 2388 178.6 +8.73 +5.24 1.507 55.6% +54 — +46 80.4% +1.83 13–3 (81%) 21–9 (70%) — -1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2259 172.5 +8.65 +3.59 1.461 55.1% +62 — +144 76.7% +1.56 11–5 (69%) 18–12 (60%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 2238 175.5 +8.09 +5.05 1.469 55.6% +3 +2 +219 77.6% +1.73 7–5 (58%) 19–6 (76%) — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 2238 141.5 +2.80 +1.39 1.278 54.4% -14 — — 65.2% +1.17 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2156 128.1 +2.89 -0.44 1.094 51.1% — +100 +258 65.8% +0.50 1–3 (25%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2432 176.3 +7.47 +4.63 1.383 55.0% +44 -66 +132 75.7% +1.60 231–127 (65%) 442–236 (65%) 102.7 -1.39 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.