H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Roger Federer vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 18-5

Roger Federer holds a 18–5 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 23 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 11–4 on hard courts and 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2018 Australian Open quarterfinal 7-6(1) 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
18 – 5
23 main draw meetings
Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 25, 2018* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Roger Federer #2 7-6(1) 6-3 6-4 Tomas Berdych #20 Match data
Jul 15, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Roger Federer #5 7-6(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 Tomas Berdych #15 Match data
Mar 31, 2017* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Roger Federer #6 6-2 3-6 7-6(6) Tomas Berdych #14 Match data
Jan 22, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Roger Federer #17 6-2 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #10 Match data
Jan 28, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Roger Federer #3 7-6(4) 6-2 6-4 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Nov 15, 2015 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Roger Federer #3 6-4 6-2 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
May 16, 2015* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Roger Federer #2 6-3 6-3 Tomas Berdych #5 Match data
Mar 20, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Roger Federer #2 6-4 6-0 Tomas Berdych #9 Match data
Mar 1, 2014* Dubai ATP 500 F Hard Roger Federer #8 3-6 6-4 6-3 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data
Mar 2, 2013* Dubai ATP 500 SF Hard Tomas Berdych #6 3-6 7-6(8) 6-4 Roger Federer #2 Match data
Sep 6, 2012* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Tomas Berdych #7 7-6(1) 6-4 3-6 6-3 Roger Federer #1 Match data
May 13, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 F Clay Roger Federer #3 3-6 7-5 7-5 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Nov 12, 2011* Paris Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Roger Federer #4 6-4 6-3 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Aug 20, 2011* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #9 6-2 7-6(3) Roger Federer #3 Match data
Aug 14, 2010* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Roger Federer #3 6-3 5-7 7-6(5) Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Jul 1, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Tomas Berdych #13 6-4 3-6 6-1 6-4 Roger Federer #2 Match data
Mar 31, 2010* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #20 6-4 6-7(3) 7-6(6) Roger Federer #1 Match data
Jan 27, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Roger Federer #2 4-6 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 6-2 Tomas Berdych #21 Match data
Jan 22, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Roger Federer #1 6-4 7-6(7) 6-3 Tomas Berdych #13 Match data
Jul 5, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-3 6-4 Tomas Berdych #14 Match data
Jun 18, 2006* Halle ATP 250 F Grass Roger Federer #1 6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 Tomas Berdych #15 Match data
Jun 7, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-2 6-3 Tomas Berdych #20 Match data
May 12, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Roger Federer #1 6-2 6-1 Tomas Berdych #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Tomas Berdych
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —