H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Roger Federer vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 19-6

Roger Federer holds a 19–6 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 25 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 12–5 on hard courts and 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2018 Australian Open quarterfinal 7-6(1) 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
19 – 6
25 main-draw meetings
Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roger Federer #2 7-6(1) 6-3 6-4 Tomas Berdych #20 Match data Jan 25, 2018* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Roger Federer #5 7-6(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 Tomas Berdych #15 Match data Jul 15, 2017* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Roger Federer #6 6-2 3-6 7-6(6) Tomas Berdych #14 Match data Mar 31, 2017* QF Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Roger Federer #17 6-2 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #10 Match data Jan 22, 2017* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Roger Federer #3 7-6(4) 6-2 6-4 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data Jan 28, 2016* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Roger Federer #3 6-4 6-2 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data Nov 15, 2015 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Roger Federer #2 6-3 6-3 Tomas Berdych #5 Match data May 16, 2015* QF Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Roger Federer #2 6-4 6-0 Tomas Berdych #9 Match data Mar 20, 2015* QF Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Roger Federer #8 3-6 6-4 6-3 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data Mar 1, 2014* F Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Tomas Berdych #6 3-6 7-6(8) 6-4 Roger Federer #2 Match data Mar 2, 2013* SF Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Tomas Berdych #7 7-6(1) 6-4 3-6 6-3 Roger Federer #1 Match data Sep 6, 2012* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Roger Federer #3 3-6 7-5 7-5 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data May 13, 2012* F Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Roger Federer #4 6-4 6-3 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data Nov 12, 2011* SF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Tomas Berdych #9 6-2 7-6(3) Roger Federer #3 Match data Aug 20, 2011* QF Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Roger Federer #3 6-3 5-7 7-6(5) Tomas Berdych #7 Match data Aug 14, 2010* QF Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tomas Berdych #13 6-4 3-6 6-1 6-4 Roger Federer #2 Match data Jul 1, 2010* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tomas Berdych #20 6-4 6-7(3) 7-6(6) Roger Federer #1 Match data Mar 31, 2010* R16 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Roger Federer #2 4-6 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 6-2 Tomas Berdych #21 Match data Jan 27, 2009* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Roger Federer #1 6-3 7-6(4) Tomas Berdych #20 Match data Aug 15, 2008* R16 Beijing Olympics Olympics Hard
Roger Federer #1 6-4 7-6(7) 6-3 Tomas Berdych #13 Match data Jan 22, 2008* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-3 6-4 Tomas Berdych #14 Match data Jul 5, 2006* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Roger Federer #1 6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 Tomas Berdych #15 Match data Jun 18, 2006* F Halle Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Roger Federer #1 6-3 6-2 6-3 Tomas Berdych #20 Match data Jun 7, 2006* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Roger Federer #1 6-2 6-1 Tomas Berdych #46 Match data May 12, 2005* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tomas Berdych #79 4-6 7-5 7-5 Roger Federer #1 Match data Aug 18, 2004* R32 Athens Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,432 1,219 272 81.8% 20 28 6 24 25 103
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,233 599 324 64.9% 0 1 0 3 9 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Tomas Berdych
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2000 34–29 54.0% #29 1,790 0 0 2004 15–14 51.7% #45 1,699 0 1
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,871 0 2
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,103 1 11 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,909 0 3
22 2004 71–6 92.2% #1 2,277 4 22 2008 32–19 62.7% #20 1,924 0 4
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,342 6 33 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,888 0 5
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,399 9 45 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,922 0 5
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,327 12 53 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,082 0 6
26 2008 66–16 80.5% #2 2,212 13 57 2012 52–21 71.2% #6 2,153 0 8
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,264 15 61 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,081 0 8
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,083 0 10
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,338 16 70 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,111 0 12
30 2012 72–12 85.7% #2 2,339 17 76 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,029 0 13
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,354 17 82 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,921 0 13
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,402 17 88 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,873 0 13
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,285 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,387 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,259 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,238 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,238 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,155 20 103 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roger Federer Tomas Berdych
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 19 9 28 67.9% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2005 12 14 26 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5%
20 2002 31 11 42 73.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2003 43 10 53 81.1% 16 4 20 80.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 21 14 35 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
22 2004 45 4 49 91.8% 14 2 16 87.5% 12 0 12 100.0% — — — — 2008 25 14 39 64.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2005 50 1 51 98.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 12 0 12 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2009 21 16 37 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2006 57 2 59 96.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 12 0 12 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2010 25 19 44 56.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
25 2007 44 6 50 88.0% 16 3 19 84.2% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2011 36 15 51 70.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
26 2008 34 11 45 75.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — 2012 39 14 53 73.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2009 36 10 46 78.3% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2013 36 16 52 69.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
28 2010 48 7 55 87.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2014 38 15 53 71.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2011 45 7 52 86.5% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2015 40 16 56 71.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2012 44 8 52 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 15 2 17 88.2% — — — — 2016 27 13 40 67.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
31 2013 28 11 39 71.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2017 17 10 27 63.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
32 2014 51 8 59 86.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2015 37 6 43 86.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — 2019 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2016 8 2 10 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 41 4 45 91.1% — — — — 12 1 13 92.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 37 8 45 82.2% — — — — 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 33 7 40 82.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 770 158 928 83.0% 215 69 284 75.7% 192 29 221 86.9% 42 16 58 72.4% — 391 211 602 65.0% 131 79 210 62.4% 68 31 99 68.7% 9 3 12 75.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 1,415/1,491 of Roger Federer's and 909/923 of Tomas Berdych's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roger Federer Tomas Berdych
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1998 5/5 4.8 2.8 55.6% 71.3% 52.0% 68.0% 41.3% 62.8% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 22/26 5.4 3.7 58.0% 70.6% 50.7% 55.9% 43.7% 62.1% 36.5% 2003 3/3 13.3 4.7 56.4% 72.9% 52.7% 68.7% 29.2% 64.3% 35.1%
18 2000 46/63 7.2 3.5 59.1% 72.0% 53.4% 61.8% 43.8% 64.1% 35.0% 2004 25/29 7.5 3.8 58.1% 72.3% 47.6% 55.4% 42.0% 62.1% 37.8%
19 2001 56/66 8.0 3.1 58.6% 74.0% 52.8% 63.2% 40.8% 65.3% 38.3% 2005 57/57 7.6 2.8 57.3% 74.0% 51.4% 56.0% 44.2% 64.3% 36.2%
20 2002 66/77 6.7 2.6 60.6% 76.0% 54.5% 64.5% 47.2% 67.6% 39.2% 2006 66/66 7.6 2.8 58.6% 76.0% 52.3% 57.2% 43.6% 65.9% 38.9%
21 2003 85/90 7.7 3.0 59.5% 77.4% 58.1% 62.8% 46.8% 69.5% 42.5% 2007 62/63 7.7 2.3 58.9% 78.4% 55.0% 65.5% 48.9% 68.9% 37.7%
22 2004 74/77 7.6 2.1 62.0% 78.8% 59.2% 71.0% 43.0% 71.3% 42.1% 2008 48/51 8.0 2.1 60.3% 76.4% 55.0% 62.4% 46.9% 67.9% 38.5%
23 2005 84/84 7.1 1.8 63.3% 76.8% 60.1% 63.0% 48.6% 70.7% 42.8% 2009 57/57 6.8 2.5 58.9% 74.3% 52.7% 60.4% 39.3% 65.5% 37.5%
24 2006 95/95 6.9 1.2 62.8% 77.7% 60.6% 66.4% 47.5% 71.3% 43.0% 2010 65/65 8.1 2.4 56.4% 79.6% 56.8% 64.4% 43.0% 69.6% 40.2%
25 2007 75/76 8.0 1.1 62.0% 77.8% 60.2% 63.1% 42.8% 70.9% 41.4% 2011 73/74 6.6 2.0 58.1% 77.7% 54.4% 53.0% 43.8% 67.8% 40.5%
26 2008 76/82 8.8 0.9 64.7% 77.3% 59.2% 68.9% 44.9% 71.0% 41.2% 2012 72/73 8.5 2.3 58.8% 78.5% 55.1% 67.5% 45.3% 68.8% 39.5%
27 2009 71/71 9.3 1.9 62.6% 79.9% 58.4% 70.4% 44.8% 71.8% 38.7% 2013 74/75 8.1 2.3 58.6% 78.0% 52.4% 64.1% 43.5% 67.5% 40.0%
28 2010 78/79 8.4 1.4 62.0% 79.6% 57.1% 67.9% 46.1% 71.2% 40.9% 2014 74/75 8.2 2.6 57.5% 78.8% 54.9% 65.2% 41.6% 68.6% 39.1%
29 2011 73/73 6.9 1.3 63.8% 79.4% 59.9% 63.0% 46.1% 72.3% 41.2% 2015 79/79 7.4 2.0 56.6% 78.0% 55.5% 60.4% 48.5% 68.3% 39.9%
30 2012 74/84 8.3 1.6 62.6% 79.2% 61.5% 71.3% 47.3% 72.4% 39.8% 2016 57/58 8.4 3.0 57.1% 78.0% 50.4% 58.8% 40.7% 66.2% 36.6%
31 2013 62/62 6.4 1.7 62.7% 77.1% 57.4% 66.7% 42.8% 69.6% 40.8% 2017 53/53 7.8 2.4 57.8% 78.9% 55.1% 66.9% 51.8% 68.8% 36.1%
32 2014 78/80 8.0 1.5 63.8% 80.2% 59.1% 74.8% 46.1% 72.4% 40.9% 2018 22/23 8.2 1.9 60.3% 76.5% 50.0% 66.5% 38.8% 66.2% 37.0%
33 2015 72/72 8.3 1.7 64.2% 81.1% 59.1% 64.0% 42.9% 73.2% 41.2% 2019 22/22 6.7 2.5 59.0% 75.2% 51.5% 64.8% 39.7% 65.4% 36.8%
34 2016 28/28 8.8 1.8 62.3% 80.2% 56.9% 55.7% 39.5% 71.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 57/58 9.6 1.8 62.2% 80.7% 60.5% 64.9% 42.3% 73.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 58/59 9.2 1.9 61.8% 81.4% 60.0% 64.9% 46.0% 73.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 61/64 7.5 1.6 64.7% 79.1% 60.9% 70.9% 45.6% 72.7% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 6/6 11.0 2.2 66.8% 74.8% 56.0% 71.6% 39.6% 68.3% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 13/14 8.4 0.8 66.0% 74.0% 57.1% 68.3% 38.5% 68.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1,415/1,491 7.9 1.9 62.3% 78.1% 58.5% 66.3% 45.0% 70.7% 40.5% — 909/923 7.8 2.5 58.1% 77.3% 53.6% 61.7% 44.3% 67.4% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roger Federer Tomas Berdych
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1531 124.1 -0.27 +1.46 0.992 49.4% +46 — — 40.0% -0.20 — 1–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1664 137.6 +0.59 -0.29 0.962 49.3% +54 -178 — 46.2% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 6–7 (46%) 101.7 -0.88 2003 1526 108.9 +0.33 -1.90 0.983 49.1% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.09
18 2000 1791 147.8 +1.73 -1.34 0.976 49.9% +29 -256 -255 53.5% +0.23 7–11 (39%) 15–15 (50%) 96.5 -1.66 2004 1699 136.0 +0.40 +0.09 0.997 50.0% -15 -38 — 48.1% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 +0.26
19 2001 1874 152.8 +2.77 +1.18 1.104 51.6% +6 -185 -97 62.8% +0.73 16–7 (70%) 24–17 (59%) 111.5 -0.94 2005 1871 147.6 +2.21 -0.32 1.012 50.3% -3 -159 -286 54.1% +0.29 12–11 (52%) 13–14 (48%) 101.3 -2.61
20 2002 1944 157.7 +4.95 +1.81 1.207 53.2% +36 -161 -172 67.4% +1.09 8–10 (44%) 17–11 (61%) 96.5 +0.25 2006 1934 149.9 +3.95 +1.79 1.142 52.2% -25 -144 -133 59.6% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 13–12 (52%) 104.1 -0.19
21 2003 2104 160.5 +6.67 +5.07 1.392 55.5% +4 -242 -6 75.8% +1.74 14–8 (64%) 25–16 (61%) 102.0 -0.34 2007 1909 153.2 +5.09 +1.51 1.210 53.2% -28 -81 +50 65.3% +1.03 6–5 (55%) 20–12 (63%) 105.6 +1.36
22 2004 2278 170.0 +8.06 +5.97 1.467 56.2% +13 -270 -32 83.5% +2.21 12–3 (80%) 20–5 (80%) 108.9 -2.04 2008 1924 157.2 +4.14 +2.63 1.197 53.0% +18 -89 +16 61.1% +0.86 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.8 -0.54
23 2005 2343 171.0 +8.25 +6.57 1.459 56.2% +50 -222 +90 86.0% +2.09 15–3 (83%) 28–11 (72%) 106.0 -0.43 2009 1889 149.6 +1.93 +1.34 1.088 51.1% +8 -68 +89 56.1% +0.35 13–11 (54%) 14–8 (64%) 101.9 +1.55
24 2006 2400 172.2 +8.93 +6.54 1.498 56.6% +70 -164 +113 84.6% +2.25 18–2 (90%) 37–14 (73%) 108.1 -0.72 2010 1922 165.7 +5.92 +4.41 1.325 54.2% -60 +13 +227 62.2% +1.05 10–12 (45%) 10–15 (40%) 92.8 +0.74
25 2007 2327 174.3 +8.00 +5.89 1.420 55.4% +70 -34 +244 82.4% +1.89 11–4 (73%) 27–9 (75%) 103.9 -0.78 2011 2083 169.8 +5.45 +3.99 1.258 54.0% +29 -160 +53 69.2% +1.41 11–7 (61%) 13–7 (65%) 104.7 +2.97
26 2008 2212 171.1 +7.83 +5.50 1.420 55.4% +57 +138 +349 77.1% +1.70 8–9 (47%) 23–13 (64%) 91.4 -1.55 2012 2154 175.6 +5.87 +4.18 1.263 54.1% +29 -74 -142 66.3% +1.18 12–7 (63%) 17–14 (55%) 103.2 -0.55
27 2009 2265 175.1 +8.67 +3.94 1.370 54.6% -22 +153 +391 77.7% +1.60 10–11 (48%) 26–11 (70%) 98.3 -1.08 2013 2082 173.8 +4.74 +4.38 1.231 53.4% +45 -31 -22 67.2% +1.15 9–11 (45%) 17–17 (50%) 92.8 +0.42
28 2010 2311 176.3 +8.19 +5.25 1.418 55.4% +74 +19 +260 77.9% +1.71 11–6 (65%) 21–10 (68%) 101.8 -1.35 2014 2084 170.2 +4.10 +3.96 1.243 53.3% +44 -21 -19 68.2% +1.12 9–9 (50%) 9–16 (36%) 88.5 +3.87
29 2011 2339 179.2 +9.63 +5.23 1.485 56.2% +64 +28 +206 79.3% +1.80 6–6 (50%) 19–9 (68%) 98.4 -1.12 2015 2112 176.1 +5.06 +4.69 1.258 53.9% +44 +48 -47 67.7% +1.11 9–5 (64%) 24–10 (71%) 106.0 +2.13
30 2012 2339 177.8 +9.37 +4.25 1.443 55.4% +40 +42 +234 77.1% +1.76 14–4 (78%) 21–14 (60%) 100.0 -2.11 2016 2081 169.7 +3.41 +1.04 1.085 51.4% +7 +79 +38 60.9% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 15–14 (52%) 101.8 -0.93
31 2013 2189 175.5 +6.21 +4.69 1.339 54.7% +90 +81 +316 68.1% +1.26 13–8 (62%) 15–10 (60%) 99.0 -0.39 2017 2029 162.0 +4.46 +0.86 1.159 52.5% -34 +39 +113 61.1% +0.67 7–8 (47%) 16–13 (55%) 94.9 -1.68
32 2014 2354 179.1 +8.51 +5.79 1.484 55.8% +49 -129 +147 77.1% +1.71 17–7 (71%) 24–15 (62%) 101.7 -0.07 2018 1922 155.3 +2.29 +0.98 1.096 51.6% +93 +39 +185 53.4% +0.60 1–6 (14%) 3–8 (27%) 88.6 -1.07
33 2015 2402 182.0 +9.20 +6.49 1.539 56.3% +67 -142 +145 79.2% +1.90 9–4 (69%) 17–13 (57%) 98.2 -2.68 2019 1873 152.7 +1.30 +0.72 1.063 51.0% +63 — — 55.0% +0.40 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 99.1 -0.94
34 2016 2286 158.1 +6.68 +3.70 1.395 54.6% +156 -88 +162 73.4% +1.43 3–4 (43%) 9–5 (64%) 94.0 -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 2388 178.6 +8.73 +5.24 1.507 55.6% +54 — +46 80.4% +1.83 13–3 (81%) 21–9 (70%) 103.7 -1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2259 172.5 +8.65 +3.59 1.461 55.1% +62 — +144 76.7% +1.56 11–5 (69%) 18–12 (60%) 96.7 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 2238 175.5 +8.09 +5.05 1.469 55.6% +3 +2 +219 77.6% +1.73 7–5 (58%) 19–6 (76%) 102.7 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 2238 141.5 +2.80 +1.39 1.278 54.4% -14 — — 65.2% +1.17 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2156 128.1 +2.89 -0.44 1.094 51.1% — +100 +258 65.8% +0.50 1–3 (25%) 6–2 (75%) 95.3 +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2432 176.3 +7.47 +4.63 1.383 55.0% +44 -66 +132 75.7% +1.60 231–127 (65%) 442–236 (65%) 102.7 -1.39 — 2233 169.6 +4.17 +2.64 1.181 52.7% +14 -50 +11 62.3% +0.85 135–115 (54%) 200–177 (53%) 97.9 +0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.