H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Roger Smith vs David Rikl H2H: 0-1
David Rikl holds a 1–0 lead over Roger Smith in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Rikl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1994 Mexico City fourth round 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BAH
Age 62
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1994* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Rikl | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1 | Roger Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Smith | #1,352 | #96 | 297 | 1,608 | 26 | 41 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Smith | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #154 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #307 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #161 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #743 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #541 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #810 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |