H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Roger Smith vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-1
Roger Smith and Diego Nargiso are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Roger Smith won the 1994 US Open first round 7-6(4) 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BAH
Age 62
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Roger Smith | 7-6(4) 6-4 6-0 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1989* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Diego Nargiso | 6-7 7-5 6-1 | Roger Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Smith | #1,352 | #96 | 297 | 1,608 | 26 | 41 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Smith | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #154 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #307 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #161 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #743 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #541 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #810 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |