H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Roger Smith vs Maurice Ruah H2H: 1-0
Roger Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Maurice Ruah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roger Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roger Smith won the 1994 New Haven second round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BAH
Age 62
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1994* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Roger Smith | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Maurice Ruah | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Smith | #1,352 | #96 | 297 | 1,608 | 26 | 41 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maurice Ruah | #1,345 | #90 | 479 | 1,577 | 20 | 38 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Smith | Maurice Ruah | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #154 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #307 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #161 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #743 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #541 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #810 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |