H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roland Stadler vs Tomas Smid H2H: 1-1
Roland Stadler and Tomas Smid are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Roland Stadler won the 1986 Gstaad quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 67
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1986* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Roland Stadler | 6-2 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1982* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-3 6-2 | Roland Stadler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roland Stadler | #1,094 | #68 | 55 | 1,684 | 47 | 72 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roland Stadler | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #439 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #184 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #98 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1982 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #159 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #85 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1984 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #255 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #411 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1986 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #132 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #181 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |