H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Rolf Thung vs Jaime Pinto Bravo H2H: 0-2

Jaime Pinto Bravo holds a 2–0 lead over Rolf Thung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Pinto Bravo leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Pinto Bravo won the 1974 Louisville round of 64 6-3 7-5.

NED Age 75 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
CHI Age 86 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jaime Pinto Bravo 6-3 7-5 Rolf Thung Match data Aug 7, 1974* R64 Louisville ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Pinto Bravo 6-4 6-3 Rolf Thung Match data Jul 19, 1973* R32 Dutch Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rolf Thung #662 #86 0 1,532 21 68 23.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jaime Pinto Bravo 1,625 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rolf Thung Jaime Pinto Bravo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
18 1970 0–1 0.0% 1,469 0 0
20 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,456 0 0
21 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,444 0 0
22 1974 4–7 36.4% #150 1,475 0 0
23 1975 11–28 28.2% #134 1,494 0 0
24 1976 3–19 13.6% #182 1,406 0 0
25 1977 2–5 28.6% #181 1,415 0 0
26 1978 1–4 20.0% #328 1,401 0 0
28 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,395 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rolf Thung Jaime Pinto Bravo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1970 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1975 1 5 6 16.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
24 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1978 1 4 5 20.0%
28 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1968 8 7 15 53.3%
29 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 1970 0 3 3 0.0%
31 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2%
32 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0%
33 1973 3 10 13 23.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%
35 1975 9 11 20 45.0%
36 1976 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 1977 4 5 9 44.4%
38 1978 0 1 1 0.0%
39 1979 1 0 1 100.0%
43 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 4 13 17 23.5% 7 33 40 17.5% 3 9 12 25.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 5 16 21 23.8% 49 73 122 40.2% 4 12 16 25.0% 1 13 14 7.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rolf Thung Jaime Pinto Bravo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1484 91.5 0.0% -5.50 +0.03
18 1970 1469 97.1 0.0% -2.50 +0.14
20 1972 1457 98.5 0.0% -2.00 +0.10
21 1973 1444 98.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.16
22 1974 1475 110.5 +54 +6 +91 44.8% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 +0.89
23 1975 1494 122.5 +57 -25 28.6% -1.44 3–2 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 101.0 +1.33
24 1976 1406 108.8 +127 -26 +70 20.0% -1.82 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 97.1 +1.63
25 1977 1416 101.3 +103 +10 35.3% -0.82 0–1 0–1 +0.35
26 1978 1401 103.2 -20 27.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.50
28 1980 1396 100.9 0.0% -3.00 -0.02 1968 1540 107.1 -12 51.2% -0.02 2–1 (67%) -0.51
29 1969 1513 111.4 -23 +33 30.0% -0.87 3–2 (60%) -0.45
30 1970 1487 106.9 -38 20.0% -1.50 0–1 -0.41
31 1971 1492 119.5 +50 -35 32.4% -1.15 0–1 1–1 +0.05
32 1972 1558 121.1 +15 -82 40.0% -0.67 5–2 (71%) 1–1 -0.63
33 1973 1554 117.6 -74 +55 38.4% -0.85 5–11 (31%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 +1.26
34 1974 1448 108.8 -73 +96 -31 28.6% -1.62 1–9 (10%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 +1.72
35 1975 1507 124.1 +61 43.5% -0.33 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +2.26
36 1976 1557 127.6 +43 41.9% -0.48 2–3 (40%) 0–1 -0.04
37 1977 1603 118.1 +22 40.9% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.15
38 1978 1583 99.4 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.19
39 1979 1595 100.5 66.7% +0.67 1–0 +0.22
43 1983 1576 97.8 33.3% -2.33 0–1 +0.21
Career 1533 114.2 +77 -21 +60 27.9% -1.39 7–11 (39%) 7–15 (32%) 95.7 +5.81 1626 122.8 -62 +33 -14 37.6% -0.82 24–37 (39%) 10–15 (40%) 96.8 +2.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.