H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Rolf Thung vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 0-2
Ken Rosewall holds a 2–0 lead over Rolf Thung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1975 Hong Kong third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 74
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1975* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ken Rosewall | 6-0 6-1 | Rolf Thung | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1975* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ken Rosewall | 6-2 6-3 | Rolf Thung | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolf Thung | #662 | #86 | 0 | 1,532 | 21 | 68 | 23.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rolf Thung | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #150 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 11–28 | 28.2% | #134 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 3–19 | 13.6% | #182 | 1,394 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #263 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #328 | 1,393 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,388 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |