H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Roscoe Tanner vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 0-1

Andres Gimeno holds a 1–0 lead over Roscoe Tanner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andres Gimeno leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andres Gimeno won the 1972 Los Angeles round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roscoe Tanner

USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H

0 – 1

1 main-draw meetings

Andres Gimeno

ESP Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Andres Gimeno	6-3 6-2	Roscoe Tanner	Match data	Feb 18, 1972*	R16	Los Angeles	ATP 250	Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Roscoe Tanner	#789	#4	0	2,162	592	294	66.8%	1	0	0	0	16	17
Andres Gimeno	#150	#49	0	2,044	247	132	65.2%	1	0	0	0	9	10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Roscoe Tanner							Andres Gimeno
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1969	0–2	0.0%	—	1,479	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	0–9	0.0%	—	1,416	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	16–10	61.5%	—	1,706	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	29–14	67.4%	—	1,910	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1973	45–30	60.0%	#24	1,837	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1974	65–27	70.7%	#14	1,963	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1975	65–23	73.9%	#9	1,972	0	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1976	70–28	71.4%	#11	2,018	0	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1977	52–30	63.4%	#13	1,889	1	11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1978	57–22	72.2%	#11	1,940	1	13	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1979	61–19	76.2%	#5	2,032	1	15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1980	42–16	72.4%	#13	1,996	1	16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1981	51–22	69.9%	#12	1,925	1	17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1982	20–17	54.1%	#43	1,785	1	17	1968	48–27	64.0%	—	1,755	0	1
31	1983	16–13	55.2%	#36	1,874	1	17	1969	47–21	69.1%	—	1,931	0	4
32	1984	3–11	21.4%	#249	1,680	1	17	1970	41–25	62.1%	—	1,885	0	5
33	1985	0–1	0.0%	#794	1,662	1	17	1971	45–26	63.4%	—	1,930	0	6
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1972	53–23	69.7%	—	1,916	1	10
35	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1973	12–9	57.1%	#136	1,801	1	10
36	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1974	1–1	50.0%	#150	1,780	1	10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Roscoe Tanner																	Andres Gimeno
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1969	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	0	4	4	0.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	10	5	15	66.7%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	1	3	66.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	9	3	12	75.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	9	3	12	75.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1973	12	8	20	60.0%	15	9	24	62.5%	3	4	7	42.9%	15	9	24	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1974	30	11	41	73.2%	8	7	15	53.3%	17	3	20	85.0%	10	6	16	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1975	27	7	34	79.4%	16	8	24	66.7%	9	2	11	81.8%	13	6	19	68.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1976	22	10	32	68.8%	22	6	28	78.6%	10	3	13	76.9%	16	9	25	64.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1977	8	6	14	57.1%	16	9	25	64.0%	22	6	28	78.6%	6	9	15	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1978	19	8	27	70.4%	6	3	9	66.7%	7	2	9	77.8%	25	9	34	73.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1979	21	5	26	80.8%	5	2	7	71.4%	10	2	12	83.3%	25	10	35	71.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1980	14	6	20	70.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	12	2	14	85.7%	16	7	23	69.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1981	19	8	27	70.4%	1	1	2	50.0%	10	5	15	66.7%	21	8	29	72.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1982	10	8	18	55.6%	—	—	—	—	4	2	6	66.7%	6	7	13	46.2%	1968	17	7	24	70.8%	21	12	33	63.6%	7	4	11	63.6%	3	4	7	42.9%
31	1983	7	5	12	58.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	3	4	7	42.9%	1969	10	6	16	62.5%	13	5	18	72.2%	15	7	22	68.2%	9	3	12	75.0%
32	1984	1	8	9	11.1%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	1970	10	8	18	55.6%	8	4	12	66.7%	11	4	15	73.3%	12	9	21	57.1%
33	1985	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1971	14	9	23	60.9%	19	7	26	73.1%	4	3	7	57.1%	8	7	15	53.3%
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1972	16	8	24	66.7%	20	6	26	76.9%	9	2	11	81.8%	8	7	15	53.3%
35	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1973	—	—	—	—	10	8	18	55.6%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—
36	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1974	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	209	102	311	67.2%	99	59	158	62.7%	121	42	163	74.2%	163	91	254	64.2%	—	67	38	105	63.8%	92	43	135	68.1%	48	21	69	69.6%	40	30	70	57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Roscoe Tanner																Andres Gimeno
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1969	1479	102.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	28.6%	-1.14	0–1	—	—	-0.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	1417	113.2	—	—	—	—	+103	+73	—	13.6%	-1.45	0–2	1–2 (33%)	—	-0.50	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	1706	127.5	—	—	—	—	-2	-129	-172	56.9%	+0.31	6–2 (75%)	5–4 (56%)	109.3	-0.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	1910	135.7	—	—	—	—	-21	-296	-167	59.5%	+0.43	11–3 (79%)	14–8 (64%)	112.5	-0.27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1973	1838	144.5	—	—	—	—	+53	-90	-106	56.7%	+0.51	11–10 (52%)	15–15 (50%)	101.4	-3.40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1974	1963	154.0	—	—	—	—	-10	-226	+137	65.9%	+1.12	16–13 (55%)	15–17 (47%)	97.4	-2.27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1975	1972	153.3	—	—	—	—	+62	-153	+164	67.7%	+1.19	19–14 (58%)	17–14 (55%)	98.4	-0.74	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1976	2018	159.4	—	—	—	—	+24	-49	+104	66.7%	+1.29	18–11 (62%)	18–20 (47%)	96.6	-2.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1977	1890	153.2	—	—	—	—	-1	+22	+206	62.7%	+0.94	13–18 (42%)	11–12 (48%)	88.2	-0.49	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1978	1941	160.3	—	—	—	—	+36	-25	+162	67.2%	+1.20	10–8 (56%)	23–10 (70%)	104.9	-1.59	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1979	2032	164.1	—	—	—	—	+32	-91	+131	71.3%	+1.27	13–8 (62%)	22–14 (61%)	102.5	-3.91	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1980	1997	154.8	—	—	—	—	+23	—	+198	70.9%	+1.29	6–10 (38%)	17–5 (77%)	96.9	-1.79	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1981	1926	156.1	—	—	—	—	+117	—	+82	66.0%	+1.02	14–9 (61%)	19–13 (59%)	99.1	-0.51	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1982	1786	138.8	—	—	—	—	+4	—	+208	51.5%	-0.01	9–6 (60%)	10–12 (45%)	96.5	-2.07	1968	1756	123.0	—	—	—	—	-44	-36	-165	61.2%	+0.85	13–13 (50%)	—	—	-1.68
31	1983	1874	146.4	—	—	—	—	-44	—	+125	53.4%	+0.14	7–5 (58%)	11–7 (61%)	105.3	-4.29	1969	1932	142.4	—	—	—	—	-16	-12	-127	64.2%	+1.04	14–7 (67%)	—	—	-4.00
32	1984	1681	120.1	—	—	—	—	-28	—	—	25.8%	-1.52	2–2 (50%)	1–2 (33%)	—	-0.69	1970	1885	146.9	—	—	—	—	+13	-14	+43	59.9%	+0.84	11–9 (55%)	0–4 (0%)	97.5	-4.73
33	1985	1662	99.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.00	0–1	1–0	—	+0.08	1971	1931	151.3	—	—	—	—	+2	+34	-58	62.4%	+1.08	11–10 (52%)	11–19 (37%)	93.6	-5.65
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1972	1916	149.6	—	—	—	—	-29	+158	+37	67.0%	+1.31	9–9 (50%)	5–4 (56%)	99.1	+0.63
35	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1973	1801	118.2	—	—	—	—	—	+83	+142	51.8%	+0.45	6–2 (75%)	1–2 (33%)	100.1	+1.86
36	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1974	1781	103.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	+0.50	—	—	—	+0.59
Career	—	2162	157.4	—	—	—	—	+30	-96	+112	63.1%	+0.88	155–123 (56%)	200–155 (56%)	99.8	-2.84	—	2044	144.9	—	—	—	—	-13	+37	-51	62.3%	+0.99	64–50 (56%)	17–29 (37%)	95.2	-3.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Roscoe Tanner's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Jimmy Connors	4	17	21	Aug 22, 1984	H2H
Bjorn Borg	4	12	16	Sep 12, 1981	H2H
Brian Teacher	11	3	14	Mar 29, 1984	H2H
Dick Stockton	9	4	13	Sep 23, 1982	H2H
Raul Ramirez	4	9	13	Feb 20, 1982	H2H

Andres Gimeno's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Ken Rosewall	4	17	21	Nov 5, 1971	H2H
Rod Laver	6	15	21	Oct 15, 1971	H2H
Roy Emerson	13	5	18	Aug 15, 1971	H2H
Fred Stolle	11	6	17	Oct 3, 1970	H2H
John Newcombe	5	6	11	Jul 22, 1971	H2H