H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Roscoe Tanner vs Bernie Mitton H2H: 7-1

Roscoe Tanner holds a 7–1 lead over Bernie Mitton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1981 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-4 6-2.

USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
RSA Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roscoe Tanner #8 6-4 6-2 Bernie Mitton Match data Aug 19, 1981* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard
Roscoe Tanner #10 6-2 6-1 Bernie Mitton #54 Match data Feb 25, 1981* R64 Memphis ATP 250 Carpet
Roscoe Tanner #11 6-3 3-6 6-3 Bernie Mitton #57 Match data Feb 19, 1981* R32 La Quinta ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner #10 6-3 6-4 Bernie Mitton #60 Match data Feb 6, 1981* R16 Richmond Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Roscoe Tanner #5 7-5 7-5 Bernie Mitton #71 Match data Aug 26, 1979* SF Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard
Bernie Mitton #57 4-6 6-3 6-4 Roscoe Tanner #9 Match data May 18, 1977* R64 Italian Open ATP 250 Clay
Roscoe Tanner 8-6 9-7 Bernie Mitton Match data Oct 31, 1975* R16 Paris Masters ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner 7-6 6-4 Bernie Mitton Match data Sep 18, 1975* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17
Bernie Mitton #766 #42 0 1,827 206 223 48.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roscoe Tanner Bernie Mitton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1971 0–1 0.0% 1,476 0 0
17 1969 0–2 0.0% 1,479 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,452 0 0
18 1970 0–9 0.0% 1,416 0 0 1973 11–4 73.3% #179 1,620 0 0
19 1971 16–10 61.5% 1,706 0 0 1974 5–5 50.0% #161 1,618 0 0
20 1972 29–14 67.4% 1,910 0 0 1975 20–19 51.3% #51 1,769 0 0
21 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0 1976 16–21 43.2% #65 1,767 0 0
22 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2 1977 23–32 41.8% #76 1,690 0 0
23 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5 1978 36–31 53.7% #62 1,729 0 1
24 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9 1979 29–26 52.7% #58 1,754 0 2
25 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11 1980 28–29 49.1% #60 1,689 0 2
26 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13 1981 13–19 40.6% #94 1,618 0 2
27 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15 1982 8–11 42.1% 1,592 0 2
28 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16 1983 13–16 44.8% #100 1,615 0 2
29 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17 1984 4–8 33.3% #243 1,615 0 2
30 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17
31 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17
32 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17
33 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roscoe Tanner Bernie Mitton
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1971 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1969 0 2 2 0.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
19 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1975 10 6 16 62.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5% 1976 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 10 17 41.2%
22 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1977 7 11 18 38.9% 10 11 21 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 1978 10 9 19 52.6% 1 7 8 12.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 12 10 22 54.5%
24 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0% 1979 16 9 25 64.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 10 12 16.7%
25 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1980 11 12 23 47.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5% 1981 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1983 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4% 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1982 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
31 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2% 80 78 158 50.6% 32 48 80 40.0% 42 36 78 53.8% 52 61 113 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roscoe Tanner Bernie Mitton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1971 1476 98.9 25.0% -1.50 1–0 -0.03
17 1969 1479 102.4 28.6% -1.14 0–1 -0.17 1972 1453 99.3 25.0% -1.00 0–1 -0.01
18 1970 1417 113.2 +103 +73 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.50 1973 1620 117.8 -40 +45 65.0% +0.73 3–1 (75%) +2.06
19 1971 1706 127.5 -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) -0.17 1974 1618 122.7 -11 +31 50.0% +0.32 0–1 0–1 +0.84
20 1972 1910 135.7 -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) -0.27 1975 1769 147.6 +16 -189 -71 52.3% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 0–3 (0%) -1.56
21 1973 1838 144.5 +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) -3.40 1976 1767 139.9 +10 -219 -13 48.4% -0.12 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) -1.92
22 1974 1963 154.0 -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) -2.27 1977 1691 147.0 +38 -50 +7 42.1% -0.36 10–8 (56%) 4–7 (36%) -5.59
23 1975 1972 153.3 +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) -0.74 1978 1730 140.2 +36 -163 +100 54.1% +0.07 12–16 (43%) 13–6 (68%) +1.76
24 1976 2018 159.4 +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) -2.11 1979 1754 138.0 -3 -152 +74 50.4% +0.16 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) +1.29
25 1977 1890 153.2 -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) -0.49 1980 1689 138.1 +25 -92 +105 48.6% +0.15 11–10 (52%) 6–14 (30%) +1.90
26 1978 1941 160.3 +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) -1.59 1981 1619 131.7 +55 +59 40.8% -0.26 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) +0.87
27 1979 2032 164.1 +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) -3.91 1982 1593 116.0 +74 -15 +33 45.7% -0.35 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) +1.86
28 1980 1997 154.8 +23 +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) -1.79 1983 1615 124.3 +25 -22 49.3% -0.26 3–9 (25%) 8–6 (57%) +1.68
29 1981 1926 156.1 +117 +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) -0.51 1984 1616 122.3 -2 +7 37.5% -1.03 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) -0.98
30 1982 1786 138.8 +4 +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) -2.07
31 1983 1874 146.4 -44 +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) -4.29
32 1984 1681 120.1 -28 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) -0.69
33 1985 1662 99.2 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 +0.08
Career 2162 157.4 +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84 1827 143.0 +25 -104 +57 48.7% -0.04 64–75 (46%) 57–69 (45%) 95.6 +0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.