H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Roscoe Tanner vs Bob Lutz H2H: 5-4

Roscoe Tanner holds a 5–4 lead over Bob Lutz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Bob Lutz leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Bob Lutz won the 1984 La Quinta round of 32 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 4
9 main draw meetings
Bob Lutz
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bob Lutz 7-6 6-3 Roscoe Tanner #41 Match data Feb 16, 1984* R32 La Quinta ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner #23 7-5 6-3 Bob Lutz Match data Aug 14, 1982* R16 La Costa Wct ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 2-6 6-4 7-6 Roscoe Tanner #18 Match data Sep 26, 1980* R16 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet
Roscoe Tanner #6 6-4 6-2 Bob Lutz Match data Apr 26, 1979* R32 Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner 7-5 6-4 Bob Lutz Match data Apr 2, 1977* QF Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Carpet
Bob Lutz 7-6 6-1 Roscoe Tanner Match data Oct 8, 1976* R16 Maui ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 4-6 6-4 6-4 Roscoe Tanner Match data Jan 16, 1976* R16 Indianapolis Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Roscoe Tanner 8-6 6-1 8-9 6-4 Bob Lutz Match data Jun 25, 1975* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Roscoe Tanner #14 6-3 6-2 Bob Lutz Match data May 17, 1975* QF Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17
Bob Lutz — — — 2,053 388 272 58.8% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roscoe Tanner Bob Lutz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0 1968 23–15 60.5% — 1,707 0 0
21 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0 1969 24–16 60.0% — 1,845 0 0
22 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2 1970 23–18 56.1% — 1,855 0 2
23 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5 1971 45–25 64.3% — 1,992 0 4
24 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9 1972 36–29 55.4% — 1,912 0 5
25 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,841 0 5
26 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13 1974 15–18 45.5% — 1,745 0 5
27 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15 1975 36–19 65.5% — 1,875 0 6
28 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16 1976 27–17 61.4% — 1,926 0 6
29 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17 1977 36–22 62.1% — 1,833 0 6
30 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17 1978 28–16 63.6% — 1,917 0 7
31 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17 1979 23–13 63.9% — 1,889 0 8
32 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17 1980 33–17 66.0% — 1,952 0 11
33 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17 1981 10–13 43.5% — 1,788 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1982 6–15 28.6% — 1,698 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1983 3–3 50.0% — 1,698 0 11
36 — — — — — — — 1984 3–1 75.0% — 1,740 0 11
37 — — — — — — — 1985 1–1 50.0% — 1,742 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roscoe Tanner Bob Lutz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1968 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5% 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1970 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 1971 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0% 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 22 16 38 57.9%
25 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1973 6 4 10 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5% 1974 5 5 10 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4% 1975 15 8 23 65.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 17 6 23 73.9%
28 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
29 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4% 1977 9 9 18 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
30 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1978 14 5 19 73.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
31 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
32 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 22 8 30 73.3% 1 0 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
33 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2% — 145 103 248 58.5% 54 47 101 53.5% 68 40 108 63.0% 121 82 203 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roscoe Tanner Bob Lutz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) 109.3 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) 112.5 -0.27 1968 1708 127.8 — — — — -52 -164 +67 59.8% +0.80 4–5 (44%) — — -2.16
21 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) 101.4 -3.40 1969 1846 130.9 — — — — -50 -320 +54 53.3% +0.29 10–3 (77%) — — -1.31
22 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) 97.4 -2.27 1970 1855 135.8 — — — — -25 — +52 56.6% +0.49 4–8 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 95.6 -0.30
23 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) 98.4 -0.74 1971 1992 148.4 — — — — +23 -288 -66 59.7% +0.74 12–8 (60%) 9–10 (47%) 102.7 -4.07
24 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) 96.6 -2.11 1972 1913 151.7 — — — — +8 -156 +37 56.2% +0.37 12–14 (46%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 -4.12
25 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) 88.2 -0.49 1973 1841 135.1 — — — — +30 — — 57.1% +0.44 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -1.03
26 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) 104.9 -1.59 1974 1745 137.0 — — — — +68 -31 +144 42.5% -0.23 3–4 (43%) 7–9 (44%) 96.4 -2.71
27 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) 102.5 -3.91 1975 1875 152.4 — — — — +83 -147 — 63.6% +1.08 7–4 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 -0.90
28 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) 96.9 -1.79 1976 1926 158.4 — — — — +60 -149 -54 56.3% +0.54 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 102.0 -4.63
29 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) 99.1 -0.51 1977 1833 152.1 — — — — +43 -24 +83 58.8% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 7–10 (41%) 99.8 -3.05
30 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) 96.5 -2.07 1978 1917 150.2 — — — — +30 -70 — 61.5% +0.80 8–5 (62%) 7–7 (50%) 100.3 -2.30
31 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) 105.3 -4.29 1979 1890 140.1 — — — — +29 — -26 63.9% +1.27 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 94.4 +0.36
32 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69 1980 1952 152.7 — — — — +46 — -133 61.7% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.36
33 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 1981 1789 132.9 — — — — +6 — — 47.3% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 96.4 -1.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1698 127.1 — — — — +10 +75 — 31.4% -1.04 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.4 -1.57
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1698 117.4 — — — — +8 — — 53.8% +0.46 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1740 119.9 — — — — +6 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 1–0 — -0.67
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1742 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — -0.35
Career — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84 — 2053 152.2 — — — — +26 -133 +21 56.9% +0.55 106–87 (55%) 75–86 (47%) 96.1 -4.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.