H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Roscoe Tanner vs Dick Crealy H2H: 4-2

Roscoe Tanner holds a 4–2 lead over Dick Crealy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1976 Perth quarterfinal 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Dick Crealy
AUS Age 81 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roscoe Tanner 3-6 6-4 6-2 Dick Crealy Match data Oct 30, 1976* QF Perth ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner 6-2 7-6 Dick Crealy Match data Jul 18, 1976* SF Cincinnati Open ATP 250 Clay
Roscoe Tanner 6-2 6-3 Dick Crealy Match data Oct 23, 1974* R32 Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard
Dick Crealy 6-2 6-2 Roscoe Tanner Match data Aug 8, 1973* R32 Louisville ATP 250 Clay
Roscoe Tanner 6-4 3-6 6-3 Dick Crealy Match data Apr 5, 1973* R16 Vancouver Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Dick Crealy 7-5 6-4 Roscoe Tanner Match data Mar 23, 1973* R16 Washington Wct ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17
Dick Crealy #509 #33 0 1,903 338 317 51.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roscoe Tanner Dick Crealy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5 1968 31–16 66.0% — 1,646 0 0
24 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9 1969 30–23 56.6% — 1,639 0 0
25 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11 1970 32–21 60.4% — 1,700 0 1
26 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13 1971 10–23 30.3% — 1,598 0 1
27 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15 1972 18–14 56.2% — 1,716 0 1
28 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16 1973 31–33 48.4% #51 1,623 0 1
29 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17 1974 41–39 51.2% #71 1,719 0 1
30 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17 1975 41–37 52.6% #56 1,738 0 2
31 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17 1976 49–35 58.3% #38 1,783 0 2
32 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17 1977 31–30 50.8% #67 1,672 0 2
33 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17 1978 19–33 36.5% #131 1,567 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 1979 1–10 9.1% #274 1,498 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 1980 3–2 60.0% #309 1,511 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roscoe Tanner Dick Crealy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 1968 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — —
24 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0% 1969 6 5 11 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — —
25 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1970 6 6 12 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5% 1971 2 4 6 33.3% 5 10 15 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1973 4 5 9 44.4% 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 12 11 23 52.2%
29 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4% 1974 7 10 17 41.2% 17 17 34 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1975 5 8 13 38.5% 21 15 36 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1976 12 4 16 75.0% 30 20 50 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
32 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 19 16 35 54.3% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — —
33 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 6 12 18 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2% — 53 58 111 47.7% 156 134 290 53.8% 97 76 173 56.1% 32 49 81 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roscoe Tanner Dick Crealy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74 1968 1647 121.1 — — — — — -10 +56 61.9% +0.86 8–4 (67%) — — +0.41
24 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11 1969 1640 118.3 — — — — +10 +67 +26 55.6% +0.27 5–8 (38%) — — +1.20
25 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49 1970 1700 134.6 — — — — -75 +134 +67 59.1% +0.64 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.35
26 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59 1971 1598 133.0 — — — — -33 +84 +121 29.9% -1.06 5–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) — -4.26
27 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91 1972 1717 124.1 — — — — -157 +50 +30 55.6% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 4–1 (80%) — +1.63
28 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79 1973 1624 127.7 — — — — +8 +31 +65 48.6% +0.01 7–8 (47%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.24
29 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51 1974 1719 137.0 — — — — -67 -18 +78 51.5% +0.05 14–12 (54%) 14–17 (45%) — -0.63
30 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07 1975 1738 138.0 — — — — -69 +20 +95 50.8% +0.12 16–8 (67%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.44
31 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29 1976 1783 142.6 — — — — -2 -8 +8 58.4% +0.68 14–16 (47%) 12–17 (41%) — +2.69
32 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69 1977 1673 127.5 — — — — +57 +18 +45 49.7% -0.07 10–12 (45%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.90
33 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 1978 1567 129.0 — — — — +98 +15 +91 40.5% -0.56 11–14 (44%) 3–13 (19%) — -0.07
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1499 117.0 — — — — +99 +43 +128 22.2% -1.18 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1512 105.5 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% +0.60 1–1 0–1 — +1.27
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1510 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.51
Career — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84 — 1904 135.4 — — — — -9 +24 +62 51.7% +0.15 101–98 (51%) 76–88 (46%) 95.7 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.