H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Roscoe Tanner vs Francois Jauffret H2H: 0-1
Francois Jauffret holds a 1–0 lead over Roscoe Tanner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francois Jauffret leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francois Jauffret won the 1973 Caracas round-robin match 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 84
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1973 | Caracas | ATP 250 | RR | Hard | Francois Jauffret | 6-3 6-4 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
| Francois Jauffret | #662 | #20 | 0 | 1,889 | 194 | 131 | 59.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roscoe Tanner | Francois Jauffret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 | 1968 | 14–5 | 73.7% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 | 1969 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 | 1970 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 | 1971 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 | 1972 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 | 1973 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #45 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 | 1974 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 | 1975 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #58 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #180 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #423 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |