H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC

Roscoe Tanner vs Graham Stilwell H2H: 2-1

Roscoe Tanner holds a 2–1 lead over Graham Stilwell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Graham Stilwell leads 1–0 on carpet, while Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Graham Stilwell won the 1975 San Francisco round of 64 7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 75 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Graham Stilwell
GBR Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Graham Stilwell 7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2 Roscoe Tanner Match data Sep 28, 1975* R64 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet
Roscoe Tanner 6-4 6-4 Graham Stilwell Match data Jul 20, 1973* R16 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay
Roscoe Tanner 6-4 4-6 6-3 Graham Stilwell Match data Sep 4, 1972* R32 South Orange ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 293 66.9% 1 0 0 0 16 17
Graham Stilwell #62 #62 0 1,731 96 180 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roscoe Tanner Graham Stilwell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 0–8 0.0% — 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,707 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2 1968 19–15 55.9% — 1,608 0 0
23 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5 1969 11–6 64.7% — 1,723 0 0
24 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9 1970 15–28 34.9% — 1,618 0 0
25 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11 1971 9–32 22.0% — 1,544 0 0
26 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13 1972 10–27 27.0% — 1,558 0 0
27 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15 1973 15–33 31.2% #109 1,573 0 0
28 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16 1974 3–14 17.6% #128 1,495 0 0
29 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17 1975 14–25 35.9% #83 1,612 0 0
30 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17 — — — — — — —
31 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17 — — — — — — —
32 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17 — — — — — — —
33 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roscoe Tanner Graham Stilwell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1968 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 1969 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0% 1970 5 7 12 41.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 7 8 12.5%
25 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1971 2 9 11 18.2% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
26 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5% 1972 2 9 11 18.2% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 5 14 19 26.3%
27 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4% 1973 5 6 11 45.5% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 13 17 23.5%
28 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
29 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4% 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 12 17 29.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
30 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 58 157 63.1% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2% — 19 39 58 32.8% 26 54 80 32.5% 30 28 58 51.7% 21 59 80 26.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roscoe Tanner Graham Stilwell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1422 112.1 — — — — +98 — — 10.5% -1.68 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1708 127.3 — — — — -4 -120 -175 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) 109.3 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -290 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) 112.5 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1837 144.4 — — — — +54 -88 -105 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) 101.4 -3.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 1963 153.9 — — — — -10 -225 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) 97.4 -2.27 1968 1609 114.5 — — — — -44 — +72 55.8% +0.51 7–6 (54%) — — +1.35
23 1975 1972 153.2 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) 98.4 -0.74 1969 1724 128.1 — — — — -62 -101 -15 62.1% +0.90 4–4 (50%) — — -0.21
24 1976 2018 159.3 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) 96.6 -2.11 1970 1619 122.5 — — — — -16 -23 -3 33.9% -1.05 4–2 (67%) — — -1.80
25 1977 1889 153.2 — — — — 0 +24 +207 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) 88.2 -0.49 1971 1544 122.8 — — — — -58 +44 +4 26.8% -1.30 3–5 (38%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -2.60
26 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) 104.9 -1.59 1972 1559 133.3 — — — — -76 +39 — 30.0% -1.21 2–6 (25%) 3–7 (30%) 97.3 -2.32
27 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +33 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) 102.5 -3.91 1973 1574 128.6 — — — — -16 -40 -18 33.6% -0.86 7–8 (47%) 0–12 (0%) 94.9 -0.92
28 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) 96.9 -1.79 1974 1496 115.7 — — — — +31 -37 — 26.8% -1.22 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 94.3 -0.15
29 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) 99.1 -0.51 1975 1613 134.2 — — — — -31 -144 +19 41.5% -0.49 5–6 (45%) 3–5 (38%) 102.6 +0.47
30 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) 96.5 -2.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) 105.3 -4.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -98 +112 63.2% +0.88 155–122 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.9 -2.83 — 1732 130.7 — — — — -36 -43 +29 38.6% -0.61 33–43 (43%) 12–36 (25%) 93.8 -2.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.