H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Roscoe Tanner vs Jim Osborne H2H: 1-1

Roscoe Tanner and Jim Osborne are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on grass, while Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1974 Maui round of 16 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jim Osborne
USA Age 81 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roscoe Tanner #15 6-4 7-6 Jim Osborne Match data Oct 10, 1974* R16 Maui ATP 250 Hard
Jim Osborne 7-6 7-5 Roscoe Tanner Match data Aug 19, 1970* R64 Merion ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17
Jim Osborne #831 #211 0 1,811 118 121 49.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roscoe Tanner Jim Osborne
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5 1968 35–24 59.3% — 1,634 0 0
24 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9 1969 29–17 63.0% — 1,743 0 0
25 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11 1970 26–29 47.3% — 1,665 0 0
26 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13 1971 15–19 44.1% — 1,717 0 0
27 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15 1972 8–20 28.6% — 1,525 0 0
28 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16 1973 0–4 0.0% — 1,500 0 0
29 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17 1974 3–2 60.0% #228 1,553 0 0
30 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,550 0 0
31 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17 1976 2–2 50.0% #211 1,575 0 0
32 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17 — — — — — — —
33 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17 1978 0–1 0.0% #465 1,573 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roscoe Tanner Jim Osborne
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 1968 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0% 1969 8 5 13 61.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5% 1971 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4% 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
28 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1973 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2% — 55 55 110 50.0% 19 24 43 44.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 17 19 36 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roscoe Tanner Jim Osborne
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74 1968 1634 115.0 — — — — +72 -103 -46 57.0% +0.47 7–9 (44%) — — -0.30
24 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11 1969 1744 126.2 — — — — +78 -107 -67 58.3% +0.69 8–2 (80%) — — +1.41
25 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49 1970 1665 122.6 — — — — +52 -115 +4 46.3% -0.07 9–10 (47%) 4–3 (57%) — +2.54
26 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59 1971 1717 116.9 — — — — -83 -182 +67 49.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.99
27 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91 1972 1525 122.7 — — — — +64 -28 +142 38.9% -0.29 1–10 (9%) 1–12 (8%) — +1.15
28 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79 1973 1501 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 11.1% -1.67 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
29 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51 1974 1553 112.6 — — — — +29 — — 58.3% +0.42 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.21
30 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07 1975 1550 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.16
31 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29 1976 1576 112.5 — — — — +12 — — 50.0% +0.17 2–2 (50%) — — -0.11
32 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 1978 1574 109.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.24
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1556 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1543 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07
Career — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84 — 1812 123.5 — — — — +39 -108 -18 49.9% +0.11 29–38 (43%) 17–25 (40%) 93.8 +2.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.