H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Roscoe Tanner vs Marty Riessen H2H: 3-6

Marty Riessen holds a 6–3 lead over Roscoe Tanner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Marty Riessen leads 3–2 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1979 Los Angeles Open round of 16 6-7 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 6
9 main draw meetings
Marty Riessen
USA Age 84 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roscoe Tanner #4 6-7 6-4 7-6 Marty Riessen #38 Match data Sep 21, 1979* R16 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Carpet
Roscoe Tanner #6 7-6 6-4 Marty Riessen #44 Match data Jun 15, 1979* R16 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass
Roscoe Tanner #10 6-2 6-3 Marty Riessen #65 Match data Mar 17, 1979* SF Washington Indoor ATP 250 Carpet
Marty Riessen 7-6 6-3 Roscoe Tanner Match data Jan 20, 1979* QF Baltimore Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Marty Riessen 7-5 0-6 7-6 Roscoe Tanner Match data Jul 27, 1974* QF Chicago ATP 250 Carpet
Marty Riessen 6-4 7-5 Roscoe Tanner Match data Jul 27, 1974* R16 Washington ATP 250 Clay
Marty Riessen 7-6(4) 6-0 7-6(3) Roscoe Tanner Match data Feb 4, 1973* F Milan Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Marty Riessen 6-1 6-2 Roscoe Tanner Match data Sep 6, 1971* QF South Orange ATP 250 Hard
Marty Riessen 1-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 Roscoe Tanner Match data Aug 29, 1969* R128 US Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17
Marty Riessen #382 #11 0 2,105 531 314 62.8% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roscoe Tanner Marty Riessen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9 — — — — — — —
25 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11 — — — — — — —
26 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13 1968 95–36 72.5% — 1,652 0 2
27 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15 1969 47–34 58.0% — 1,806 0 3
28 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16 1970 52–29 64.2% — 1,944 0 5
29 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17 1971 68–31 68.7% — 1,990 0 6
30 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17 1972 55–28 66.3% — 1,964 0 7
31 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17 1973 46–25 64.8% #13 1,858 0 8
32 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17 1974 55–23 70.5% #12 1,959 0 9
33 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17 1975 21–15 58.3% #24 1,895 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 1976 18–23 43.9% #59 1,831 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 1977 18–19 48.6% #54 1,834 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 1978 11–11 50.0% #83 1,789 0 10
37 — — — — — — — 1979 34–23 59.6% #37 1,831 0 11
38 — — — — — — — 1980 10–13 43.5% #92 1,691 0 11
39 — — — — — — — 1981 1–4 20.0% #93 1,695 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roscoe Tanner Marty Riessen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5% 1968 41 14 55 74.5% 34 14 48 70.8% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4% 1969 7 7 14 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 15 12 27 55.6%
28 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1970 16 11 27 59.3% 7 4 11 63.6% 17 7 24 70.8% 12 7 19 63.2%
29 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4% 1971 20 10 30 66.7% 24 8 32 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 10 8 18 55.6%
30 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1972 16 8 24 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
31 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1973 7 5 12 58.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 27 11 38 71.1%
32 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1974 11 7 18 61.1% 20 5 25 80.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 16 8 24 66.7%
33 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 10 20 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 9 7 16 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 23 13 36 63.9%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2% — 147 92 239 61.5% 128 65 193 66.3% 85 46 131 64.9% 171 111 282 60.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roscoe Tanner Marty Riessen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59 1968 1653 132.0 — — — — +69 +87 +61 68.5% +1.54 20–8 (71%) — — -0.80
27 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91 1969 1807 136.9 — — — — -21 -43 -20 57.3% +0.56 10–14 (42%) — — -3.21
28 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79 1970 1945 146.2 — — — — +35 -163 -65 60.8% +0.91 14–8 (64%) 5–3 (63%) — -1.75
29 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51 1971 1990 154.3 — — — — -35 -15 +39 59.4% +0.60 26–10 (72%) 18–19 (49%) — -9.98
30 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07 1972 1965 158.1 — — — — +28 +23 +41 61.7% +0.70 17–14 (55%) 16–16 (50%) — -8.28
31 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29 1973 1858 145.0 — — — — +69 +39 +86 58.6% +0.64 17–6 (74%) 12–13 (48%) — -1.09
32 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69 1974 1959 151.5 — — — — +21 +54 -7 67.7% +0.98 11–12 (48%) 15–9 (63%) — -5.03
33 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 1975 1895 140.7 — — — — +39 +26 +50 61.2% +0.68 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1832 149.5 — — — — +12 +33 +68 46.7% -0.24 1–8 (11%) 5–2 (71%) — -5.35
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1835 151.7 — — — — +43 +2 +6 52.7% +0.16 2–8 (20%) 8–3 (73%) — -3.73
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1789 132.2 — — — — +28 — +31 50.0% +0.14 5–5 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.07
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1832 145.5 — — — — +16 +5 +8 57.4% +0.12 10–8 (56%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.40
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1691 124.0 — — — — +33 +84 — 48.1% -0.33 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.21
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1695 122.5 — — — — +17 — — 30.0% -0.80 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.89
Career — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84 — 2106 150.4 — — — — +26 +22 +11 60.0% +0.69 139–112 (55%) 108–87 (55%) 102.2 -5.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.