H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Roscoe Tanner vs Patricio Cornejo H2H: 2-2
Roscoe Tanner and Patricio Cornejo are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patricio Cornejo leads 2–0 on clay, while Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patricio Cornejo won the 1978 Louisville third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 82
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1978* | Louisville | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricio Cornejo | 6-4 6-3 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1977* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Patricio Cornejo | 5-7 6-1 6-4 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1976* | Columbus | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 6-2 6-0 | Patricio Cornejo | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1975* | Sao Paulo Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Roscoe Tanner | 7-5 6-2 | Patricio Cornejo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
| Patricio Cornejo | #335 | #65 | 0 | 1,708 | 142 | 202 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roscoe Tanner | Patricio Cornejo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 | 1968 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 | 1969 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 | 1970 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 | 1971 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 | 1972 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 | 1973 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 | 1974 | 20–32 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 | 1975 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #138 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 | 1976 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #108 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 | 1977 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #69 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #172 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |