H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Roscoe Tanner vs Rolf Thung H2H: 1-0

Roscoe Tanner holds a 1–0 lead over Rolf Thung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1976 Perth round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Rolf Thung
NED Age 75 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roscoe Tanner 6-2 6-4 Rolf Thung Match data Oct 29, 1976* R16 Perth ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17
Rolf Thung #662 #86 0 1,532 21 68 23.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roscoe Tanner Rolf Thung
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,469 0 0
19 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,456 0 0
21 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,444 0 0
22 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2 1974 4–7 36.4% #150 1,475 0 0
23 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5 1975 11–28 28.2% #134 1,494 0 0
24 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9 1976 3–19 13.6% #182 1,406 0 0
25 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11 1977 2–5 28.6% #181 1,415 0 0
26 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13 1978 1–4 20.0% #328 1,401 0 0
27 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15 — — — — — — —
28 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,395 0 0
29 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17 — — — — — — —
30 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17 — — — — — — —
31 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17 — — — — — — —
32 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17 — — — — — — —
33 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roscoe Tanner Rolf Thung
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5% 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 1975 1 5 6 16.7% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
24 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0% 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5% 1978 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2% — 4 13 17 23.5% 7 33 40 17.5% 3 9 12 25.0% 7 13 20 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roscoe Tanner Rolf Thung
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1484 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.03
17 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 1970 1469 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.14
19 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27 1972 1457 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.10
21 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40 1973 1444 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.16
22 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27 1974 1475 110.5 — — — — +54 +6 +91 44.8% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.89
23 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74 1975 1494 122.5 — — — — +57 -25 — 28.6% -1.44 3–2 (60%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.33
24 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11 1976 1406 108.8 — — — — +127 -26 +70 20.0% -1.82 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) — +1.63
25 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49 1977 1416 101.3 — — — — +103 — +10 35.3% -0.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
26 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59 1978 1401 103.2 — — — — — -20 — 27.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.50
27 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79 1980 1396 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.02
29 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84 — 1533 114.2 — — — — +77 -21 +60 27.9% -1.39 7–11 (39%) 7–15 (32%) 95.7 +5.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.