H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roscoe Tanner vs Ross Case H2H: 5-0
Roscoe Tanner holds a 5–0 lead over Ross Case in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1979 Wimbledon third round 6-4 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 1979* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Roscoe Tanner | 6-4 7-5 7-6 | Ross Case | Match data |
| May 18, 1975* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 5-7 7-5 7-6 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1975* | Caracas Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1974* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 9-7 3-6 7-5 | Ross Case | Match data |
| May 16, 1974* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 6-4 6-4 | Ross Case | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roscoe Tanner | Ross Case | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |