H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roscoe Tanner vs Victor Amaya H2H: 2-1
Roscoe Tanner holds a 2–1 lead over Victor Amaya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victor Amaya won the 1980 Las Vegas fourth round 6-7 6-3 4-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Left-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1980* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Victor Amaya | 6-7 6-3 4-6 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1979* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Roscoe Tanner | 6-2 6-4 | Victor Amaya | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1978* | New Orleans | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Roscoe Tanner | 6-3 7-5 | Victor Amaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
| Victor Amaya | #739 | #15 | 0 | 1,988 | 187 | 173 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roscoe Tanner | Victor Amaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #223 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #96 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #105 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 | 1980 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 | 1981 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #85 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 | 1982 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #73 | 1,583 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |