H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ross Case vs Bob Carmichael H2H: 1-2
Bob Carmichael holds a 2–1 lead over Ross Case in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ross Case leads 1–0 on clay, while Bob Carmichael leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bob Carmichael won the 1975 Hong Kong fourth round 3-6 6-0 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1975* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Bob Carmichael | 3-6 6-0 8-6 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1974* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Bob Carmichael | 7-5 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Ross Case | Match data |
| May 9, 1973* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ross Case | 6-1 6-3 | Bob Carmichael | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Bob Carmichael | #157 | #55 | 0 | 1,903 | 215 | 256 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Bob Carmichael | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 48–33 | 59.3% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 36–33 | 52.2% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 20–30 | 40.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 24–37 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #112 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #71 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #134 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–18 | 5.3% | #220 | 1,428 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |