H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ross Case vs Bob Hewitt H2H: 1-2
Bob Hewitt holds a 2–1 lead over Ross Case in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Bob Hewitt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ross Case won the 1976 Philadelphia Wct second round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 86
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 1976* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Ross Case | 6-0 6-3 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1972* | Albany | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Bob Hewitt | 6-1 6-1 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1972* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Bob Hewitt | 5-7 6-4 3-1 (ret.) | Ross Case | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Bob Hewitt | #669 | #32 | 0 | 2,005 | 285 | 178 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Bob Hewitt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 51–15 | 77.3% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 31–11 | 73.8% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 52–16 | 76.5% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,666 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #206 | 1,596 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,547 | 0 | 11 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 11 |