H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ross Case vs Cliff Richey H2H: 1-1
Ross Case and Cliff Richey are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cliff Richey leads 1–0 on clay, while Ross Case leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1975 Melbourne Indoor quarterfinal 4-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1975* | Melbourne Indoor | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Cliff Richey | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | Ross Case | Match data |
| May 17, 1975* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ross Case | 6-3 1-6 7-6 | Cliff Richey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Cliff Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 |