H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ross Case vs John Marks H2H: 2-1
Ross Case holds a 2–1 lead over John Marks in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ross Case leads 2–0 on grass, while John Marks leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Marks won the 1979 Tulsa third round 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1979* | Tulsa | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | John Marks | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Dec 27, 1975* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Ross Case | 6-2 6-1 | John Marks | Match data |
| Dec 22, 1970* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Ross Case | 7-5 6-4 | John Marks | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| John Marks | #223 | #60 | 0 | 1,631 | 30 | 81 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | John Marks | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #330 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 4–26 | 13.3% | #115 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |