H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ross Case vs Jun Kuki H2H: 5-0
Ross Case holds a 5–0 lead over Jun Kuki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ross Case leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ross Case won the 1980 Tokyo Outdoor second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1980* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ross Case | 6-4 6-2 | Jun Kuki | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1979* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ross Case | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Jun Kuki | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1972* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ross Case | 4-6 9-7 7-5 | Jun Kuki | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1972* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Ross Case | 6-3 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Jun Kuki | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1971* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ross Case | 6-4 6-4 | Jun Kuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Jun Kuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #217 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #101 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 11–28 | 28.2% | #161 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #201 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #146 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #389 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #356 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |