H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ross Case vs Jurgen Fassbender H2H: 2-0
Ross Case holds a 2–0 lead over Jurgen Fassbender in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ross Case leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ross Case won the 1976 Manila fourth round 7-5 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1976* | Manila | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ross Case | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1973* | Djkarta | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Ross Case | 6-7 6-2 6-4 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jurgen Fassbender | #618 | #31 | 0 | 1,868 | 170 | 167 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Jurgen Fassbender | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #46 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 41–30 | 57.7% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #242 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |