H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ross Case vs Nick Saviano H2H: 1-3
Nick Saviano holds a 3–1 lead over Ross Case in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nick Saviano leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nick Saviano won the 1980 Rancho Mirage second round 6-3 4-6 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1980* | Rancho Mirage | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Nick Saviano | 6-3 4-6 3-1 (ret.) | Ross Case | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1979* | North Conway | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ross Case | 6-3 6-1 | Nick Saviano | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1977* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nick Saviano | 6-3 6-2 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1976* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Nick Saviano | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Ross Case | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nick Saviano | #736 | #48 | 0 | 1,789 | 158 | 199 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Nick Saviano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #115 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #62 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 32–32 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #72 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #93 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #97 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #99 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |