H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ross Case vs Patrick Proisy H2H: 1-2
Patrick Proisy holds a 2–1 lead over Ross Case in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Patrick Proisy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ross Case won the 1980 Tokyo Outdoor third round 6-3 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1980* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ross Case | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1973* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Patrick Proisy | 6-2 6-4 6-1 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1971* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Patrick Proisy | 7-6 6-3 | Ross Case | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Patrick Proisy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |