H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ross Case vs Roy Emerson H2H: 1-0
Ross Case holds a 1–0 lead over Roy Emerson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ross Case leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ross Case won the 1974 San Francisco third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1974* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ross Case | 6-2 6-2 | Roy Emerson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Roy Emerson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 |