H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ross Case vs Stan Smith H2H: 1-5
Stan Smith holds a 5–1 lead over Ross Case in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Stan Smith leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Stan Smith won the 1981 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Stan Smith | 6-3 7-6 7-6 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1975* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Stan Smith | 6-7 6-3 6-1 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1974* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Stan Smith | 6-0 6-3 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1971* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Stan Smith | 6-3 7-6 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1970* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ross Case | (w/o) | Stan Smith | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1969* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Stan Smith | 10-8 6-3 6-2 | Ross Case | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Stan Smith | — | #3 | 0 | 2,254 | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 37 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Stan Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |