H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Ross Case vs Tom Okker H2H: 1-3
Tom Okker holds a 3–1 lead over Ross Case in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Tom Okker leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1977 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1977* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tom Okker | 6-2 6-1 6-1 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1973* | Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tom Okker | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1973* | Denver Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ross Case | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1973* | Washington Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-1 6-3 | Ross Case | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ross Case | Tom Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 30 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |