H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Charlie Pasarell H2H: 1-2
Charlie Pasarell holds a 2–1 lead over Roy Emerson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Charlie Pasarell leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Roy Emerson won the 1971 Fort Worth Wct quarterfinal 6-7 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1971* | Fort Worth Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Roy Emerson | 6-7 6-1 6-1 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Nov 27, 1969* | Stockholm Open | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Charlie Pasarell | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Roy Emerson | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1969* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Charlie Pasarell | 6-3 6-2 | Roy Emerson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Charlie Pasarell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |