H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Dick Crealy H2H: 2-0
Roy Emerson holds a 2–0 lead over Dick Crealy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roy Emerson leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roy Emerson won the 1971 Montreal / Toronto second round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1971* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Roy Emerson | 7-6 6-3 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1969* | Bristol | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Roy Emerson | 6-1 9-7 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Dick Crealy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |