H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Francois Jauffret H2H: 0-1
Francois Jauffret holds a 1–0 lead over Roy Emerson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francois Jauffret leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francois Jauffret won the 1969 Buenos Aires semifinal 6-2 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 84
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1969* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Francois Jauffret | 6-2 6-4 6-3 | Roy Emerson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Francois Jauffret | #662 | #20 | 0 | 1,889 | 194 | 131 | 59.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Francois Jauffret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 14–5 | 73.7% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #45 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #58 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #180 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #423 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |