H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 3-0
Roy Emerson holds a 3–0 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roy Emerson leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roy Emerson won the 1969 Wembley third round 11-9 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1969* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Roy Emerson | 11-9 6-3 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1969* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roy Emerson | 6-3 6-4 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1968* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Roy Emerson | 5-7 6-1 6-2 6-0 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |