H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Jim Osborne H2H: 1-0
Roy Emerson holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roy Emerson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Roy Emerson won the 1968 New York 1 fourth round 3-6 9-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1968* | New York 1 | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Roy Emerson | 3-6 9-7 6-2 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Jim Osborne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |