H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Pierre Barthes H2H: 3-0
Roy Emerson holds a 3–0 lead over Pierre Barthes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roy Emerson leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roy Emerson won the 1970 Tucson quarterfinal 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 84
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1970* | Tucson | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Roy Emerson | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Pierre Barthes | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1969* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Roy Emerson | 11-9 6-2 | Pierre Barthes | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1969 | Portschach | ATP 250 | RR | Clay | Roy Emerson | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Pierre Barthes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Pierre Barthes | #265 | #57 | 0 | 1,887 | 185 | 190 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Pierre Barthes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–46 | 38.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 22–29 | 43.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 47–25 | 65.3% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 40–25 | 61.5% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #79 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #222 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #247 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |