H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Ray Keldie H2H: 1-0
Roy Emerson holds a 1–0 lead over Ray Keldie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roy Emerson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roy Emerson won the 1971 Berkeley second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1971* | Berkeley | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Roy Emerson | 6-4 6-2 | Ray Keldie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Ray Keldie | #190 | #113 | 0 | 1,622 | 64 | 106 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Ray Keldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,380 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–23 | 32.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #190 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #218 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |