H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Raymond Moore H2H: 3-1
Roy Emerson holds a 3–1 lead over Raymond Moore in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roy Emerson leads 2–0 on clay, while Raymond Moore leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Raymond Moore won the 1977 Memphis second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1977* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Raymond Moore | 6-1 6-4 | Roy Emerson | Match data |
| Jul 13, 1973* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Roy Emerson | 6-1 6-1 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
| May 10, 1970* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Roy Emerson | 6-3 6-4 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
| May 30, 1969* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Roy Emerson | 3-6 6-2 5-7 6-0 6-3 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Raymond Moore | #503 | #32 | 0 | 1,892 | 357 | 376 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Raymond Moore | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 35–23 | 60.3% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 32–39 | 45.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 17–28 | 37.8% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 36–36 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #39 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 35–30 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #138 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #99 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #112 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #100 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |