H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo vs Eric Prodon H2H: 1-1
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo and Eric Prodon are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2006 Buenos Aires third round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2006* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Eric Prodon | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2003* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Eric Prodon | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eric Prodon | #891 | #83 | 623 | 1,566 | 1 | 19 | 5.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Eric Prodon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #325 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #633 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |