H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Ryan Harrison vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-0
Ryan Harrison holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ryan Harrison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ryan Harrison won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 7-6(5) 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2017* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Ryan Harrison | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ryan Harrison | 7-6(5) 6-0 7-5 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Harrison | #1,551 | #40 | 1,160 | 1,893 | 117 | 155 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ryan Harrison | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #748 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #79 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #69 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #100 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #112 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #302 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #479 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |