H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Ryan Harrison vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 1-1
Ryan Harrison and Rajeev Ram are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Rajeev Ram won the 2015 US Open first round 7-6(3) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Rajeev Ram | 7-6(3) 6-4 6-1 | Ryan Harrison | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2011* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ryan Harrison | 4-6 6-1 7-6(5) | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Harrison | #1,551 | #40 | 1,160 | 1,893 | 117 | 155 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ryan Harrison | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #748 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #79 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #69 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #100 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #112 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #302 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #479 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |