H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Sam Querrey vs Antony Dupuis
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Sam Querrey vs Antony Dupuis.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Querrey | #529 | #11 | 2,595 | 2,037 | 372 | 315 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sam Querrey | Antony Dupuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #130 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #63 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #25 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #18 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #93 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #22 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,877 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,943 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #44 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,817 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #108 | 1,702 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #329 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |