H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Sam Querrey vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 5-1

Sam Querrey holds a 5–1 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2019 Eastbourne quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2019* Eastbourne ATP 250 QF Grass Sam Querrey #79 7-6(4) 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #36 Match data
Apr 11, 2015* Houston ATP 250 SF Clay Sam Querrey #42 7-5 2-6 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #30 Match data
Oct 31, 2012* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Sam Querrey #23 6-1 1-1 (ret.) Fernando Verdasco #25 Match data
Oct 4, 2012* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Sam Querrey #26 5-7 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #23 Match data
Mar 15, 2011* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Sam Querrey #24 7-5 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data
Aug 29, 2009* New Haven ATP 250 F Hard Fernando Verdasco #10 6-4 7-6(6) Sam Querrey #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,037 372 315 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sam Querrey Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,540 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,636 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2008 28–23 54.9% #39 1,786 0 1 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,899 0 2 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,816 0 6 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,877 0 7 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,893 0 7 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,810 0 7 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,798 0 8 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,943 0 10 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,822 0 10 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,817 0 10 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,702 0 10 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,649 0 10 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7