H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sam Querrey vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 6-1

Sam Querrey holds a 6–1 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 6–0 on hard courts, while Ivo Karlovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2018 New York quarterfinal 7-6(5) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 2018* New York ATP 250 QF Hard Sam Querrey #12 7-6(5) 7-6(4) Ivo Karlovic #89 Match data
Sep 19, 2013* Metz ATP 250 R32 Hard Sam Querrey #31 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #73 Match data
Mar 10, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Sam Querrey #23 6-3 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #143 Match data
Aug 31, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Sam Querrey #55 7-6(5) 7-6(5) 6-2 Ivo Karlovic #14 Match data
Jun 20, 2008* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Ivo Karlovic #22 7-6(3) 7-6(14) Sam Querrey #42 Match data
Jul 23, 2007 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Sam Querrey #90 5-7 7-5 7-6(6) Ivo Karlovic #43 Match data
Feb 22, 2007* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Sam Querrey #92 6-3 6-2 Ivo Karlovic #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,037 372 315 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sam Querrey Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 28–23 54.9% #39 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,899 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,816 0 6 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,877 0 7 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,893 0 7 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,810 0 7 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,798 0 8 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,943 0 10 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,822 0 10 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,817 0 10 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,702 0 10 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,649 0 10 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8