H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sam Querrey vs Jerzy Janowicz H2H: 1-2
Jerzy Janowicz holds a 2–1 lead over Sam Querrey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jerzy Janowicz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2014 Paris Masters second round 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2014* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sam Querrey | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | Jerzy Janowicz | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2014* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jerzy Janowicz | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Sam Querrey | Match data |
| May 7, 2013* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jerzy Janowicz | 6-3 6-4 | Sam Querrey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Querrey | #529 | #11 | 2,595 | 2,037 | 372 | 315 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Jerzy Janowicz | #735 | #14 | 2,154 | 1,962 | 80 | 84 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sam Querrey | Jerzy Janowicz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #130 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #63 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #25 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #26 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #18 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #21 | 1,913 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #93 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,849 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #22 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,877 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,943 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #44 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,817 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #108 | 1,702 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #329 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |