H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sam Querrey vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 0-1
Jonas Bjorkman holds a 1–0 lead over Sam Querrey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 2008 Memphis fourth round 6-4 4-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | Sam Querrey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Querrey | #529 | #11 | 2,595 | 2,037 | 372 | 315 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sam Querrey | Jonas Bjorkman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #130 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #63 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #25 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #18 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #93 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #22 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,877 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2015 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2017 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,943 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2019 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #44 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,817 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #108 | 1,702 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #329 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 |