H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sam Querrey vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–2 lead over Sam Querrey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Sam Querrey leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2014 Houston fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 2014* Houston ATP 250 R16 Clay Sam Querrey #82 6-3 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #46 Match data
Jun 14, 2013* Queen's Club ATP 500 R16 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #82 5-7 6-3 6-4 Sam Querrey #19 Match data
Feb 15, 2013* San Jose ATP 250 R16 Hard Sam Querrey #20 7-6(6) 1-6 7-6(4) Lleyton Hewitt #112 Match data
Aug 21, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #42 6-1 2-6 6-3 Sam Querrey #26 Match data
Mar 16, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #24 6-4 6-3 Sam Querrey #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,037 372 315 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sam Querrey Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,540 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,636 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2008 28–23 54.9% #39 1,786 0 1 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,899 0 2 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,816 0 6 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,877 0 7 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,893 0 7 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,810 0 7 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,798 0 8 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,943 0 10 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,822 0 10 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,817 0 10 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,702 0 10 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,649 0 10 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30