H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Sam Querrey vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 3-2

Sam Querrey holds a 3–2 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2016 Nottingham fourth round 1-6 7-6(8) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2016* Nottingham ATP 250 R16 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #40 1-6 7-6(8) 6-4 Sam Querrey #33 Match data
Oct 22, 2015* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #46 7-6(2) 6-1 Sam Querrey #51 Match data
Feb 20, 2009* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Sam Querrey #37 6-1 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #106 Match data
Feb 12, 2009* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Sam Querrey #34 6-3 5-7 7-6(5) Marcos Baghdatis #82 Match data
Oct 28, 2008* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Sam Querrey #41 7-5 6-7(5) 3-2 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,037 372 315 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sam Querrey Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,636 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2008 28–23 54.9% #39 1,786 0 1 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,899 0 2 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,816 0 6 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,877 0 7 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,893 0 7 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,810 0 7 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,798 0 8 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,943 0 10 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,822 0 10 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,817 0 10 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,702 0 10 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,649 0 10 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4